On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know. We should normally begin the cleanup activity far earlier IMO, > like at the end of the commit fest month to give patch authors a > couple of weeks to rework what they have if they would like to resend > something for the next commit fest. At this stage this seems a little > bit too abrupt to just return with feedback patches without notice, > this gives patch authors no room to submit new patches, assuming that > authors were waiting for the patch to be marked as returned with > feedback to move on to a new approach suggested by the reviewers.
+1. FWIW, I'm willing to review some patches for this CommitFest, but if the committers have to do first-round review as well as committer-review of every patch in the CommitFest, this is going to be long, ugly, and painful. We need to have a substantial pool of non-committers involved in the review process so that at least some of the work gets spread out. Expecting the 6-10 reasonably active committers to handle all the review work for 50-100 patches is a fail. This is not directed at you personally, Michael; you've done a ton of review. Unfortunately, you've been one of only a few. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
