On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> That's still strange to have a dummy object in >> postgres_fdw.so just for testing purposes. > > We could drop the extra functions at the end of the test, but I don't > see the point exactly. We'd just be leaving the regression test database > with some odd contents of the extension --- there's not any wider effect > than that.
Oh, I see. Then we rely just on the fact that postgres_fdw is installed. Are you working on a patch? Do you need one? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
