Hi, Please find attached updated patch with an updated interface.
On Jan 26, 2016 11:22 AM, "Vinayak Pokale" <vinpok...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Amit, > > Thank you for reviewing the patch. > > On Jan 26, 2016 9:51 AM, "Amit Langote" <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Vinayak, > > > > On 2016/01/25 20:58, Vinayak Pokale wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please find attached updated patch with an updated interface. > > > > > > > Thanks for updating the patch. > > > > > I added the below interface to update the > > > scanned_heap_pages,scanned_index_pages and index_scan_count only. > > > void pgstat_report_progress_scanned_pages(int num_of_int, uint32 > > > *progress_scanned_pages_param) > > > > I think it's still the same interface with the names changed. IIRC, what > > was suggested was to provide a way to not have to pass the entire array > > for the update of a single member of it. Just pass the index of the > > updated member and its new value. Maybe, something like: > > > > void pgstat_progress_update_counter(int index, uint32 newval); > > > > The above function would presumably update the value of > > beentry.st_progress_counter[index] or something like that. Following interface functions are added: /* * index: in the array of uint32 counters in the beentry * counter: new value of the (index)th counter */ void pgstat_report_progress_update_counter(int index, uint32 counter) /* called to updatet the VACUUM progress phase. msg: new value of (index)th message */ void pgstat_report_progress_update_message(int index, char msg[N_PROGRESS_PARAM][PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH]) Regards, Vinayak
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers