On 02/02/2016 02:05 AM, Curtis Ruck wrote:

P.S., do you know what sucks, having a highly performant PostGIS database that works great, and being told to move to Oracle or SQL Server (because they have auditing). Even though they charge extra for Geospatial support (seriously?) or when they don't even have geospatial support (10 years ago). My customer would prefer to re-engineer software designed around PostgreSQL and pay the overpriced licenses, than not have auditing. I agree that their cost analysis is probably way off, even 10 years later, my only solution would be to move to Oracle, SQL Server, a NoSQL solution, or pay EnterpriseDB for their 2 year old version that doesn't have all the cool/modern jsonb support.

Huh? PPAS is already out there since at least last week; Before that PPAS 9.4.5.y or so was there ...
(Not affiliated with EDB, but precision is important)

I agree that auditing is a big selling point and frequently used... But it's got to be done "the Postgres way", and that takes time (and usually provides superior results).

Just my .02€

    / J.L.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to