Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I vote for just using sed considering we need flex and bison anyway.
> OK cool, we could go with something else than sed to generate probes.h > but that seems sensible considering that this should definitely be > back-patched. Not sure what the others think about adding a new file > in the source tarball by default though. AFAIK, sed flex and bison originate from three separate source projects; there is no reason to suppose that the presence of flex and bison on a particular system guarantee the presence of sed. I thought the proposal to get rid of the psed dependence in favor of some more perl code was pretty sane. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers