Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes: > Any versioning system that removes subjective criteria is good. These > debates in interminable and always have been.
Yeah, I got bored of the topic after about 8.0 ;-) > Personally I would go > with something even more antiseptic like basing the version on the > year, where year is defined at the 'point of no return' -- going beta > for example. I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why: it would foreclose doing two major releases per year. We have debated that sort of schedule in the past. While I don't see any reason to think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers