On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:06:26PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/13/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why: > > it would foreclose doing two major releases per year. We have debated > > that sort of schedule in the past. While I don't see any reason to > > think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we > > foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme. > > Well, we have done two major releases in a year before, mostly due to > one release being late and the succeeding one being on time.
Uh, guys, we just did it: 9.5 2016-01-07 9.6 2016-09-?? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers