On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:06:26PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why:
> > it would foreclose doing two major releases per year.  We have debated
> > that sort of schedule in the past.  While I don't see any reason to
> > think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we
> > foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme.
> Well, we have done two major releases in a year before, mostly due to
> one release being late and the succeeding one being on time.

Uh, guys, we just did it:

        9.5     2016-01-07
        9.6     2016-09-??

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to