On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:55:20PM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote: > The opinion seems to be that major.0 is some kind of magic incantation in > the broader world of users...
>From my reading of the thread, while certainly that is the general definition of a .0, having infrequent .0 releases is not very practical for PostgreSQL because the major versions are not that different from each other and all are treated the same development-wise. So it would be a huge drain on the project to discuss which major version should be a .0 unless planning towards them steps up significantly. So I think the (slight) consensus is more that all major versions are mostly equal and hence only one version number is needed. Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
