On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > I mean we haven't yet actually identified a problem we are trying to > > solve have we? > > The problem I'd like to solve is not having to have this type of > discussion again in future years ...
If pg_logical and/or more parallelism are in 9.7, there will be no need for a discussion, just like 8.0 and 9.0 decisions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
