> On 19 May 2016, at 22:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> David Christensen <da...@endpoint.com> writes:
>> This simple patch adds “ALL” as an EXPLAIN option as shorthand for “EXPLAIN 
>> (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, COSTS, TIMING, BUFFERS)” for usability.
> 
> I'm not sure this is well thought out.  It would mean for example that
> we could never implement EXPLAIN options that are mutually exclusive
> ... at least, not without having to redefine ALL as all-except-something.
> Non-boolean options would be problematic as well.
> 

Maybe EVERYTHING would be ok.
But it is kinda long word to type.


>                       regards, tom lane
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to