> On 19 May 2016, at 22:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Christensen <da...@endpoint.com> writes: >> This simple patch adds “ALL” as an EXPLAIN option as shorthand for “EXPLAIN >> (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, COSTS, TIMING, BUFFERS)” for usability. > > I'm not sure this is well thought out. It would mean for example that > we could never implement EXPLAIN options that are mutually exclusive > ... at least, not without having to redefine ALL as all-except-something. > Non-boolean options would be problematic as well. >
Advertising
Maybe EVERYTHING would be ok. But it is kinda long word to type. > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
