> On 19 May 2016, at 22:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Christensen <da...@endpoint.com> writes:
>> This simple patch adds “ALL” as an EXPLAIN option as shorthand for “EXPLAIN
>> (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, COSTS, TIMING, BUFFERS)” for usability.
> I'm not sure this is well thought out. It would mean for example that
> we could never implement EXPLAIN options that are mutually exclusive
> ... at least, not without having to redefine ALL as all-except-something.
> Non-boolean options would be problematic as well.
Maybe EVERYTHING would be ok.
But it is kinda long word to type.
> regards, tom lane
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: