On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
>> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
>> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do.  Yeah, that would be an incompatible
>> change, but that's what major releases are for no?
>
> After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.

Hmm, my experience is different.  I use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE) a
lot, but EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) only rarely.  I wonder if a GUC is
the way to go.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to