On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we >> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default >> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible >> change, but that's what major releases are for no? > > After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.
Hmm, my experience is different. I use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE) a lot, but EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) only rarely. I wonder if a GUC is the way to go. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers