> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do.  Yeah, that would be an incompatible
> change, but that's what major releases are for no?

After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to