> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we > made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default > to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible > change, but that's what major releases are for no?
After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
