> On May 19, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
>> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
>> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do.  Yeah, that would be an incompatible
>> change, but that's what major releases are for no?
> After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.

Yeah, if that’s the only practical difference, WORKSFORME; I can see the point 
about boxing us into a corner at some future time.

David Christensen
End Point Corporation

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to