> On May 19, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
>> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
>> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible
>> change, but that's what major releases are for no?
> After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.
Yeah, if that’s the only practical difference, WORKSFORME; I can see the point
about boxing us into a corner at some future time.
End Point Corporation
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: