Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh ... do we have a basis for recommending any particular sets of
>> parameters for these different scenarios? This could be a good idea
>> in the abstract, but I'm not sure I know enough to fill in the details.
> Without too much hacking around, you could pretty easily adapt the
> pg_autotune code to do proper profiles of a system with different settings.
> i.e. increment one setting at a time, run pgbench on it with some decent
> amount of transactions and users, stuff the results into a different
> database.
If I thought that pgbench was representative of anything, or even
capable of reliably producing repeatable numbers, then I might subscribe
to results derived this way. But I have little or no confidence in
pgbench. Certainly I don't see how you'd use it to produce
recommendations for a range of application scenarios, when it's only
one very narrow scenario itself.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
