On 10/07/16 08:00, Andrew Gierth wrote:
"Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> I'm not quite sure what you mean by wanting to do arithmetic on the
>> numbers. My phrasing of the problem is that after a long query, you
>> might get output like this:
>> Time: 1234567.666 ms
>> which is pretty useless.
Tom> What I mean by that is that not infrequently, I'll run the same
Tom> query several times and then want to average the results. That's
Tom> easy with awk or similar scripts as long as the numbers are in
Tom> straight decimal.
Tom> I don't mind if we provide a way to print in Babylonian-inspired
Tom> notation(s) as well, but I'm going to be seriously annoyed if
Tom> that's the only way to get the output.
How about
Time: 1234567.666 ms (20m 34.6s)
?
I like that, but I think the human form should retain the 3 decimal places.
In a few years, we may well have enormously multiprocessor computers
with massive very fast permanent 'RAM' where the entire database is
always in memory, so timing to the nearest microsecond could be useful.
Obviously microsecond precision would be silly now, and would probably
never warrant being the default (I'd be happy to be proved wrong here!),
but it might be worthwhile putting in as an option - while people are
looking at the relevant areas of the code.
Am inspired by the man page for 'ls': [...] The SIZE argument is an
integer and optional unit (example: 10K is 10*1024). Units are
K,M,G,T,P,E,Z,Y (powers of 1024) [...]" Obviously learnt from the
lessons of "640KB should be enough for everyone" stupidity!
Cheers,
Gavin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
