On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That's also reasonable solution, I don't really have preference between
> those. My main point was to get rid of the 5 or so variables where only one
> will actually be used in the end.

And no need to worry about the priority of the target types here. The
last value specified wins.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to