On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That's also reasonable solution, I don't really have preference between > those. My main point was to get rid of the 5 or so variables where only one > will actually be used in the end.
And no need to worry about the priority of the target types here. The last value specified wins. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
