On 11/19/2016 10:11 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote:
On Nov 19, 2016 15:33, "Andrew Dunstan" <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
I can think of at least one scenario where you might not easily have
access to any invented ID - you're the author and you have mailing list
me-too turned off, so you don't have anything that the mailing list has
inserted. I honestly think we should just stick with the Message-ID value
and get over the ugliness.
That's actually not the case if we use a hash, because the client could
figure out what the hash is before sending it.

The fact that it could possibly be done is not a good reason for doing it. Every proposal along these lines strikes me as making more unobvious hoops for people to jump through. We're just reinventing the wheel here because we don't like the color of the standard wheels that some email MUAs produce.



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to