On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > All backwards incompatible changes are judgement calls and people are > certainly welcome to have different opinions. I have a pretty strong > feeling about this particular change being worthwhile and also pretty > long overdue.
The renaming is definitely worth it to be consistent with the new pg_wal/. Now as in the case of those functions we have ways a simple way to avoid useless pain to users we should really take it easy. So introducing a set of aliases and deprecating them after a couple of years is a fine plan IMO. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
