Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
>> It ends up being about 30 fewer lines of code overall, despite there 
>> being four places that have to make ad-hoc RawStmt nodes.  On the whole 
>> I feel like this is cleaner,

> I agree: Better typing, more homogeneous code (PlannedStmt for all), 
> less ad-hoc checks to work around utility statements...

OK, pushed like that.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to