Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: >> It ends up being about 30 fewer lines of code overall, despite there >> being four places that have to make ad-hoc RawStmt nodes. On the whole >> I feel like this is cleaner,
> I agree: Better typing, more homogeneous code (PlannedStmt for all), > less ad-hoc checks to work around utility statements... OK, pushed like that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers