On 2017-01-16 16:04:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2017-01-16 12:17:46 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Hmm. I wonder if your stuff could be used as support code for > > > XMLTABLE[1]. > > > > I don't immediately see what functionality overlaps, could you expand on > > that? > > Well, I haven't read any previous patches in this area, but the xmltable > patch adds a new way of handling set-returning expressions, so it > appears vaguely related.
Ugh. That's not good - I'm about to remove isDone. Like completely. That's why I'm actually working on all this, because random expressions returning more rows makes optimizing expression evaluation a lot harder. > These aren't properly functions in the current sense of the word, > though. Why aren't they? Looks like it'd be doable to do so, at least below the parser level? Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
