On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> That worked quite well. So we have a few questions, before I clean this >> up: > >> - For now the node is named 'Srf' both internally and in explain - not >> sure if we want to make that something longer/easier to understand for >> others? Proposals? TargetFunctionScan? SetResult? > > "Srf" is ugly as can be, and unintelligible. SetResult might be OK.
The operation we're performing here, IIUC, is projection. SetResult lacks a verb, although Set could be confused with one; someone might think this is the node that sets a result, whatever that means. Anyway, I suggest working Project in there somehow. If Project by itself seems like it's too generic, perhaps ProjectSet or ProjectSetResult would be suitable. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
