Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> "Srf" is ugly as can be, and unintelligible. SetResult might be OK.
> The operation we're performing here, IIUC, is projection. SetResult
> lacks a verb, although Set could be confused with one; someone might
> think this is the node that sets a result, whatever that means.
> Anyway, I suggest working Project in there somehow. If Project by
> itself seems like it's too generic, perhaps ProjectSet or
> ProjectSetResult would be suitable.
Andres' patch is already using "SetProjectionPath" for the path struct
type. Maybe make that "ProjectSetPath", giving rise to a "ProjectSet"
plan node?
I'm happy to do a global-search-and-replace while I'm reviewing the
patch, but let's decide on names PDQ.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
