Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-01-16 16:04:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2017-01-16 12:17:46 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Hmm. I wonder if your stuff could be used as support code for > > > > XMLTABLE[1]. > > > > > > I don't immediately see what functionality overlaps, could you expand on > > > that? > > > > Well, I haven't read any previous patches in this area, but the xmltable > > patch adds a new way of handling set-returning expressions, so it > > appears vaguely related. > > Ugh. That's not good - I'm about to remove isDone. Like completely. > That's why I'm actually working on all this, because random expressions > returning more rows makes optimizing expression evaluation a lot harder.
Argh. > > These aren't properly functions in the current sense of the word, > > though. > > Why aren't they? Looks like it'd be doable to do so, at least below the > parser level? Hmm ... -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
