Hannu Krosing wrote:

mlw kirjutas K, 02.04.2003 kell 15:56:


Hannu Krosing wrote:



What you have come up with _is_not_ a SOAP v1.1 message at all. It does
use some elements with similar names but from different namespace.

the SOAP Envelope, Header and Body elemants must be from namespace
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/



[snip]
Hmm, I read "SHOULD" and "MAY" in the spec, assuming that it was not "MUST" are you saying it is invalid if I do not use the SOAP URIs for the name spaces? If so, no big deal, I'll change them.



AFAICS you can _leave_out_ the namespace, but not put in another, nonconforming namespace.

[snip]

I think you are interpreting the spec a bit too restrictively. The syntax is fairly rigid, but the spec has a great degree of flexibility. I agree that, syntactically, it must work through a parser, but there is lots of room to be flexible.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to