On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> By definition, the address range we're trying to reuse worked successfully
> in the postmaster process.  I don't see how forcing a specific address
> could do anything but create an additional risk of postmaster startup
> failure.

If the postmaster picked an address where other things are unlikely to
get loaded, then that would increase the chances of child processes
finding it available, wouldn't it?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to