Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent >> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really >> seriously against that?
> Is it under the same license as everything else? Hm, now that you mention it, interesting point. I was about to answer that it's under the standard BSD license, but looking closer, I see that these files still quote the old 4-clause BSD license text (with the "advertising" clause). We need to get them adjusted to be 3-clause with no advertising. Looking into a FreeBSD source tree locally, I see that FreeBSD has removed the advertising clause from all their files --- sometimes without even remembering to renumber the old clause 4 to clause 3 ;-). So Piotr needs to do likewise to conform with FreeBSD policy. Once he has, it'll be identical text to the other BSD-origin files we have in our tree, eg src/port/getopt.c. Piotr: if you're unclear on the rationale for this, see the bottom of https://www.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
