On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Not really; dynahash won't merge two keys just because their hash >> codes come out the same. But you're right; that's probably not the >> best way to do it. TBH, why do we even have pgss_hash_fn? It seems >> like using tag_hash would be superior. > > Yes, using tag_hash would be just better than any custom formula.
OK, here's v4, which does it that way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
64-bit-queryid-v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
