* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Csaba Nagy wrote: > >On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 15:29, Stephen Frost wrote: > >>It's not the PostgreSQL project's problem, that's true, but it certainly > >>becomes an issue for distributions. Java as a PL ends up being a pretty > >>odd case.. If there isn't anything in the PL code itself which forces a > >>dependency beyond gcj then it might be possible to distribute it. Also > >>allowing the PL to use a different JVM shouldn't be a problem so long as > >>nothing is distributed which depends on the alternate JVM. The GPL is > >>all about distribution and so I'm not sure that it would actually be a > >>problem for an end-user to use Sun's JVM with GPL'd Java code. > > > >Now I'm completely confused... what GPL code ? Is PL/Java licensed under > >the GPL ? Or what GPL code do you talk about ? > > What was a mistake on my part. I was tired when I wrote the part about GPL.
As for my part, I was referring to any GPL'd Java code being distributed with a given distribution (ie: Debian), possibly running under PL/Java. :) Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature