Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that is the explain for the 4h+ Q9:

The big problem there seems to be the drastic misestimation of the
number of rows matching the p_name ~~ '%ghost%' condition.  What does
pg_stats have for the p_name column?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to