Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> that is the explain for the 4h+ Q9:
> The big problem there seems to be the drastic misestimation of the
> number of rows matching the p_name ~~ '%ghost%' condition.  What does
> pg_stats have for the p_name column?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to