On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now > > > that the holiday break is over: > > > > > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold > > > > > > > Some of these look obsolete. Also, > > > > . the plperl out params patch needs substantial rework by its author, IMHO. > > . there is a new version of the enums patch that has been submitted. > > Yes, I will have to go through it, find the valuable ones, and get > comments.
Sounds good. I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists? There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject. Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS - presumably TODO items-in-waiting? Some minor points: [PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs has already been applied to 8.2 [PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas has already been agreed/applied to 8.2 -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
