On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:02 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > they
> > 
> > It would be good to know who/what you're talking about, specifically.
> > 
> > Some patchers may think they have completed their work.
> > 
> > Not a name-and-shame, just fair warning their work is considered
> > incomplete and is about to be rejected as a result.
> Not sure how to do this without name-and-shame.  I sent out emails to
> the list asking where we were on various open patches.  I can do it
> again tomorrow so there is some context in the requests.  Would that
> help?

Please publish the list. I'm sure it will raise eyebrows, but we can
sort out any misunderstandings; there's no shame in attempting something
and meeting a blockage - thats normal.

If everybody knows where everybody stands then we'll all be better off.
There may be other dependencies that need resolution, or last minute
decisions required to allow authors to finish.

Plus I want to check whether I'm on it, or not.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to