Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 14:29 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > >> untrustworthy disk hardware, for instance. I'd much rather use names > > >> derived from "deferred commit" or "delayed commit" or some such. > > > > > > Honestly, I prefer these names as well as it seems directly related versus > > > transaction guarantee which sounds to be more like us saying, if we turn > > > it off > > > our transactions are bogus. > > That was the intention..., but name change accepted. > > > Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off" > > Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of the commit. GUC as full_commit_recovery? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
