On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:19:36 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brar Piening wrote: > > Robert Treat schrieb: > >> That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to > >> hackers, so I'd > > Your'e right - of course. > > > > But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their > > interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good > > interfaces and some of the PostgreSQL-interfaces don't reach the > > standard they are reaching for other databases. > > As a windows-user I still can't drag and drop a Dataset in VS.Net > > with Npgsql and I still have to build a single-threaded perl if i > > want to use DBD::Pg (I know about DBD::PgPP). > > > > > This latter is simply not true. > > ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In > fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from > pgfoundry: And I've been using a threaded Perl on Linux/BSD systems for years. In fact, unless someone recompiles Perl every Fedora and RHEL system out there using Perl/DBI is doing it with a Perl compiled with thread support. ------------------------------------------------------- Frank Wiles, Revolution Systems, LLC. Personal : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiles.org Work : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.revsys.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match