On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:15 +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 10:55 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > IMO, monitor_ seems weird versus track_. To me monitor implies actions
> > to be taken when thresholds are met. PostgreSQL doesn't do that.
> > PostgreSQL tracks/stores information for application to monitor or
> > interact with and those application may doing something based on the
> > tracked information.
> Not that my opinion would count too much on hackers, but "track" sounds
> better to me too, seems more to the point, not to mention it's shorter
> too.
> +1 "track"

track_* wins the vote, so no change to committed code.

It's much easier when there's a clear majority, no need for further
debate that way.

  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to