Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry to raise this now. The earlier proposal for "track_" wasn't
> supported by anyone that I can see, even though we decided to change the
> way the stats parameters were arranged on those earlier threads.

Well, there was at least one other person who liked "track" at the time:
which gave it about as much support as any other alternative that was
mentioned :-(

While I don't have any strong objection to changing "track" to "monitor",
I'm not enthused by the other parts of your proposal.  In particular
I do object to using "activity" for the variable that is specifically
*not* associated with feeding pg_stat_activity.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to