On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 12:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm sorry to raise this now. The earlier proposal for "track_" wasn't > > supported by anyone that I can see, even though we decided to change the > > way the stats parameters were arranged on those earlier threads. > > Well, there was at least one other person who liked "track" at the time: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-07/msg00996.php > which gave it about as much support as any other alternative that was > mentioned :-( > > While I don't have any strong objection to changing "track" to "monitor",
> I'm not enthused by the other parts of your proposal. > In particular > I do object to using "activity" for the variable that is specifically > *not* associated with feeding pg_stat_activity. Thats a good point, that would be very confusing. So it should be stats_command_string --> monitor_activity ...and the other one would be monitor_counts? OK, that fits for me. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
