> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 01:23:13PM -0700, Barry Lind wrote:
> > I don't like this patch.  If anything I think we should remove the 
> > dependency on ANT, not remove the dependency on make.
> > 
> > By requiring ANT, we provide yet another hurdle for someone wanting to 
> > use JDBC with postgres.  I would prefer that the build environment be 
> > the same for the database as for the jdbc code.
> > 
> > Anything that makes it more difficult to download the source and get 
> > going with it is a negative in my opinion.  And from my perspective 
> > requiring the download of an additional tool (ANT in this case) makes it 
> > more difficult.
> I have no strong feelings about current situation, I simply made
> it more flexible.  About changing it, you should consult JDBC
> maintainers first, maybe they have some good reason why its
> so...

Barry and Dave are the jdbc maintainers now and I think there is general
consensus that we want to get away from Ant if possible.

  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to