David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > (BTW, does the patch handle multiple -n switches?)
>
> No, it doesn't. I can look into that if you like. The patch was
> entirely to satisfy a need some of our customers have. The -T switch
> does fill a real need for our customers; our product has a couple of tables
> that aren't critical if they aren't backed up, but as the product evolves,
> we occasionally add more tables. So it's easier to use a -T switch to
> say what *not* to back up, than multiple -t switches to say what to back up.
Ah, I see in TODO:
* Allow pg_dump to use multiple -t and -n switches
so the problem with lack of multiple -n parameters was already known.
Should we allow -n to affect subsequent -t parameters, so:
-n schema1 -t tab1 -n schema2 -t tab2
does schema1.tab1 and schema2.tab2?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
