Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> There was however another patch submitted recently that seemed to >> duplicate yours functionally but used a different syntax --- I think
> Other than Chris' suggestion of extract(timestamp from epoch)? [ looks in archives... ] Oh, actually that was *you* --- I was vaguely remembering your proposed patch of 2-Aug. You were calling the function epoch_to_timestamp at the time. I like to_timestamp(double) better than these other names ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html