TODO here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> There was however another patch submitted recently that seemed to > >> duplicate yours functionally but used a different syntax --- I think > > > Other than Chris' suggestion of extract(timestamp from epoch)? > > [ looks in archives... ] Oh, actually that was *you* --- I was vaguely > remembering your proposed patch of 2-Aug. You were calling the function > epoch_to_timestamp at the time. > > I like to_timestamp(double) better than these other names ... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
