Sorry, I now see I should add the patch to the 8.1 queue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > TODO here? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Tom Lane wrote: > > Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> There was however another patch submitted recently that seemed to > > >> duplicate yours functionally but used a different syntax --- I think > > > > > Other than Chris' suggestion of extract(timestamp from epoch)? > > > > [ looks in archives... ] Oh, actually that was *you* --- I was vaguely > > remembering your proposed patch of 2-Aug. You were calling the function > > epoch_to_timestamp at the time. > > > > I like to_timestamp(double) better than these other names ... > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
