Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmm. I've preivously been told not to use "Failed to" but instead > > use "Could not"... Didn't notice that Tom used the other one in his > > suggestion. > > > Tom (or someone else) - can you comment on if I misunderstood that > > recommendation earlier, or if it still holds? > > Oh, yes, "could not" is better. My mistake.
Ok, thanks. Committed new error messages as such then. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
