Tom Lane wrote: > > I've attached a patch that works for me. I hope I got it right. > > Applied with additional cleanup. You hadn't thought very carefully > about additional state transitions that would have to be introduced > into the postmaster state machine to support a new state --- for > example, as coded a SIGINT delivered to the postmaster after SIGTERM > would fail to do anything at all, when of course it really ought to > force us into fast shutdown. Also, it's not really that hard to > disallow non-superusers from connecting in PM_WAIT_BACKUP state.
Thank you for helping. You know, this is my first patch for server code. I know that I still have a lot to learn until I grok how all that works together. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
