chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we need to wait until a fully-parallelizing pg_restore is
> implemented before adding this functionality to pg_dump?

They're independent problems ... and I would venture that parallel
dump is harder.

> Further, it's actually not obvious that we *necessarily* care about
> parallelizing loading data.  The thing that happens every day is
> backups.

Maybe so, but I would say that routine backups shouldn't be designed
to eat 100% of your disk bandwidth anyway --- they'd be more like
background tasks.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to