> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > yeah.  I'm guessing problem is in the mingw flex/bison (which I
> > really hope is not the case) or some other win32 specific block of
> > I'm snooping around there...
> Maybe I'm confused here, but I thought we had established that the
> and remote cases behave differently for you?  If so I'd suppose that
> must be a networking issue, and there's little point in looking inside
> psql.
The local case is *worse*...presumably because psql is competing with
the server for cpu time...cpu load is pegged at 100%.  On the remote
case, I'm getting 50-60% cpu load which is way to high.  The problem is
definitely in psql.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to