This is exactly the kind of vendor propaganda I was talking aboutI suggest you read this on the difference between enterprise/SCSI and desktop/IDE drives:http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf and it proves my point quite well : that there's nothing specific relating to reliability that is different between SCSI and SATA drives cited in that paper. It does have a bunch of FUD such as 'oh yeah we do a lot more drive characterization during manufacturing'. |
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recomme... Bill McGonigle
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recomme... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recomme... Ron
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recomme... Vivek Khera
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large da... Michael Stone
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for larg... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... David Boreham
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large da... Alex Turner
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for larg... David Boreham
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for ... Alan Stange
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations ... David Boreham
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for larg... Dave Cramer
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Welty, Richard
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Merlin Moncure
- Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databas... Alan Stange