2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> > > On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> > >> >> Hello. >> >> New TxText version 0.8 is ready: >> >> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and >> TxTextTests-Editor >> >> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests >> > > I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model -> > TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc. > Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it > > > Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that > having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach > and we should clean all of them for 3.0 >
So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages? For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package should be? > > Stef > > > > >
