Use Nautilus to generate them, so you will not have to think about it :) (and you can blame someone else in case of bad naming ^^)
Ben On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> > > On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready: >>> >>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and >>> TxTextTests-Editor >> >> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests >> >> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model -> >> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc. >> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it > > Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that > having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach > and we should clean all of them for 3.0 > > So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages? > For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package > should be? > > > Stef > > > > >
