On 22 May 2013 10:38, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > I would use > > TextModelCore > TextModelExtensions > > TextModelCore-Tests > > No extra dash in the middle.
nooooo :) But for tests, i +1, the names are not very good. For package: Package-Name-Tick-Tack tests should be in: Package-Name-Tick-Tack-Tests This convention used everywhere in pharo. > Stef > > On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> >> >> >> On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready: >>> >>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and >>> TxTextTests-Editor >>> >>> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests >> >> >> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model -> >> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc. >> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it >> >> >> Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that >> having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach >> and we should clean all of them for 3.0 > > > So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages? > For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package > should be? > >> >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
